Obama Refinance plan Part 2 – New HARP Plan Will Help Underwater Home Owners Refinance their Mortgages
29th October 2011
Earlier this week, President Obama announced a new plan to rework the HARP program designed to help more homeowners take advantage of low mortgage rates. The HARP program covers loans that were taken over by Fannie Mae (DU Refi Plus) and Freddie Mac (open
Access). When the program was first rolled out, the idea was to allow homebuyers to refinance even if their homes had lost considerable value. The program was originally set to allow home owners to refinance based on their original mortgage terms, so if you had put 20% down when you first bought the home, the new loan would be treated as the same and you wouldn’t need to buy mortgage insurance, even if the value was much less now. Originally the program was set to that help even borrowers who were underwater, that is they owed more on their home than the property was worth, and the guidelines allowed up to 125% loan to value (negative equity of 25%). Unfortunately, this program worked better on paper than in real life. It worked great for the best borrowers, those who had lost value but still had some equity and had put down larger down payments originally. But it didn’t work as well for those who had second mortgages attached (many second mortgage lenders wouldn’t subordinate their loans, a necessity to refinance), and though the program went up to 125%, all the lenders put in their own overlays making it impossible for most borrowers to refinance if they didn’t have some equity in the home. As a result, the original program didn’t work any where near as well as intended, and many other wise well qualified home owners were left out in the cold.
This new version is designed to fix these problems and to help all the home owners who continue to make their mortgage payments even though their value has gone south. One of the main problems with the original plan was that Fannie and Freddie passed much of the risk on to the lenders through the representations and warranties written into their purchase agreements (most of the conventional loans are bought by Fannie or Freddie even if another lender handles the servicing or collecting the payments). The issue here is that if a loan went into default or some problem was discovered in the loan package, Fannie and Freddie could force the lender to “buy back” the loan. If a lender is forced to buy back a loan, this is an immediate loss. The fear of buy backs has been a big part of the tightening of approval guidelines over the last few years. This new version of HARP takes this off the table, and allows refinancing even if their value has declined beyond the 125% set in the first go around. So far we have the broad strokes of the program, but the details won’t be released until November 15th 2011. The first applications can be taken after December 1st. There are sure to be issues that have to be worked out, but this looks like it will help a lot of responsible home owners who owe more than their homes are worth take advantage of today’s record low interest rates.
Here are some of the changes with the new version of HARP:
- Eliminating certain risk-based fees (price hits or loan level price adjustments) for borrowers who refinance into shorter-term mortgages and lowering fees for other borrowers.
- Removing the current 125 percent LTV ceiling for fixed-rate mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
- Waiving certain representations and warranties that lenders commit to in making loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
- Eliminating the need for a new property appraisal where there is a reliable AVM (automated valuation model) estimate provided by the Enterprises.
- Extending the end date for HARP until Dec. 31, 2013 for loans originally sold to the Enterprises on or before May 31, 2009.
To Qualify, Borrowers must meet the following:
- The mortgage must be owned or guaranteed by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae.
- The mortgage must have been sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac on or before May 31, 2009.
- The mortgage cannot have been refinanced under HARP previously.
- The current loan-to-value (LTV) ratio must be greater than 80%.
- The borrower must be current on the mortgage at the time of the refinance, with no late payment in the past six months and no more than one late payment in the past 12 months.
To see if your loan is held by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, here are the links to the look up tools:
I will post more information on this program as it comes available.
Free Home Buyers Guide
You can trust in us to get the job done right.
Peter Thompson 630-479-6424
Illinois Mortgage Rates First time home buyer loans
Chicago Mortgage Company Chicago FHA Mortgages
Posted in Miscellaneous | Comments Off




for the MCC (Mortgage credit certificate) program. MCCs are issued as part of a state bond program to make housing more affordable. Most communities turn their funds over to the stat and have IHDA (the Illinois Housing Development Agency) use the funds for their low down payment grant programs ( I will have more on that later). These communities keep the funds themselves so that eligible
really are starting to hire new workers. Unemployment is still way too high, but this shows we are headed in the right direction. After finishing their meeting, the Fed also changed the wording on their report to show more optimism about the economy. Though they hedged their optimism somewhat, the statement said that the economic recovery appears to be on firmer footing and their are genuine improvements in the labor market. The Fed did bring up the concern about increasing oil and commodity prices, but their view is that long term inflation is not a threat (unless wages move higher, the higher prices will just slow down economic activity). So domestically the news is improving.
The intention of the program was too pump new money into the economy by buying treasuries and other bonds, as a way to drive interest rates lower and slowly re-inflate asset prices. The Fed’s big worry has been the risk of deflation. The concept here was to battle deflation by adding a little positive inflation into the mix. This concept has worked before when the Fed ran a similar program last year, but this time as the Fed rose up for what they considered a slam dunk, the markets slapped the ball back in their face. Over the last few months there have been signs that the economy is improving. It is still not clear that this is sustainable, but it is enough to refocus thinking from the fear of falling to the fear of over-heating and running up our debt and bankrupting the country. Instead of achieving their stated goal, the main effect of QE2 so far has been to run interest rates up, prop up the stock market and pressure the dollar which means oil prices have spiked higher. We still have some major problems associated with deflation, the housing market is still a mess and unemployment is high and not likely to get better for years. The Fed still may be proved right about deflation in the long run, but the money machine they control is more complex and the law of unintended consequences is now in play. From street level this looks a lot like stagflation, where the economy is soft but prices for gas and groceries are going up. This round of QE2 will run its course, but the Fed will need to go back to the drawing board to come up with a new way to achieve its goals. Barring a sudden down draft, there will not be a third round.
some work and you think the Chicago
mortgage markets and the economy in general, the good news is that it could have been much worse. The economy is still soft but is now showing signs of growth. The fears of a double dip recession have faded and the business analysts are now talking about how the deficit and inflation are our biggest long term risks. That may or may not be the case, but it always fascinates me how quickly conventional wisdom can change. There are some good signs, especially if you grade on a curve, but there are still some big concerns. Unemployment is still high, even after several months of good gains in the market the unemployment rate is still just under 10%, almost the same as it was last year at this time. The housing market is still in the dumps. In a lot of ways, we end this year very close to where we were last year at this time. Going forward, I expect that we will see the same things played out over the coming year.